Computerization of Public Sector Essay

IntroductionIn the midst of the Global Financial Crisis we found the Mediterranean tell isolateds, Greece, Portugal, Spain, Italy, being riotous by serious financial issues, big deficit on their counterpoise sheets, characterized by low competitiveness and enormous existence debt. Over the travel year of the GFC the policies that had been followed for those countries are mainly foc purposed around the creation of fiscal surpass by using horizontal and cross cutting methods. The results of those manoeuvre after almost 4 years of austerity measures are furthest from favorable. One reason for that is that the IMF and EU were unable to interpret deep into the line. Their patriarchal target was to found a swift and superficial solution, mainly because of the ram from the markets and governmental factors. On this research we leave focus our interest deeper into the problem and attempt reaching the core of it. One very important feeling of the crisis that the mentioned orga nizations draw non taken into account is the efficiency of the commonplace domain on the problematic countries. If the public welkin omits on efficiency and so the results would be phenomenon analogous corruption, unorganized dep subterfugements, tax evasion and absence of comm compass north between agencies. One great factor that determines the efficiency of a state is the computerization of its public sector. And that is what our research will be focused on. important lit termture used on the researchTo reach the needed results we have to bewilder the proper literature, we have to use that as a low for our research and to help us on extracting our conclusions. We need to analyze the mental synthesis of the Public Sector Management on those countries and to learn how important the fiber of computerization is on an efficient government. That is exactly what (Dunleavy, 2006) tried to show us. How rattling computerization is for the public administrator and its role o n key factors like taxation, decentralization, bureaucracy and public corruption. Another aspect we have to use on our literature research is the quality on public sector.What is its relation with a computerized state how is affected by that. Quality is an important element of a successful computerization process, their bonds are strong, quality is considered fundamental for a public sector to become more efficient and to increase its performance (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995). implementation is another important factor that has a crucial role on a healthy public sector. It helps to increase its military strength, that leads to a more ethereal and innovative system (Bruijn, 2006). After we successfully incorporate those components into the public governance we would be able to observe the impact of computerization on the economical constancy of a country (Snellen et al., 1989). Advantages of a computerized public sectorIf we look into the literature we will see that the Medite rranean states that are deadlocked, actually unconnected from their deficit they have one more common thing, their corruption ratings (Transparency international, 2011 OECD, 2011). and then we observe a great proportion of tax evasion, and restrict bureaucracy (World Bank, 2012) and low competitiveness against other states (Klaus Schwab, 2012). The advantage of a computerized public sector, apart from the efficiency (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995), is the addition on effectiveness too (Willcocks and Harrow, 1992). except we good deal a great mendment on transparency (OECD, 2011) and on availableness of the services as well as on productivity (Hayes, 1977). all the p refreshens factors are on a sequence, first of all the immediate reception of a computerized sector is to improve its quality (Pollitt and Bouckaert, 1995), that is conceivable through an adaption of hot public management standards (Hood, 1998), next step is the improvement of performance (Margetts, 1999)(Dunleavy, 2006). Moreover after we succeed on adapting quality and performance into the public sector, the effectiveness (GAO,1991) and the efficiency occurs (Willcocks and Harrow, 1992). As a result an economic stability will commence (HMSO, 1983)(Klein, 1988). All the above have shown that will result on a better tax administrator (Snellen et al., 1989)(Naur, 1974) and have as an takings the better taxation (Margetts, 1999). Still the most important thing that gets neutralised is the political interception (Herring, 1967).ArgumentsThe main arguments about computerization of the public sector directs from the employees. A factor is the poverty of knowledge about the use of new technologies and their lack of interest on learning them. Another important factor is the political and union interests (Transparency international, 2011). On the above mentioned countries, unions and political parties have a thickening relationship. This suggests a major concern for an improvement effort of public sectors administration.Managers lack the will to adapt innovative ideas into their departments. And the corrupted bureaucratic states roots are so deep that ought great effort to overcome those obstacles. (Jorma, 1988). Other arguments come from the cost of a computerization update (Dunleavy, 2006). Furthermore, arguments about the part that computerization had on the instability of the Mediterranean States are expressed from organizations like IMF, on their monthly reports they do not take into account the individuality and the complexity of the public sector on those countries (IMF, 2012).MethodologyFor the research to be conducted we have to use a combine of quantifiable, by using the N data sets and qualitative methods by the use of enquiries. Because of the nature of the research some factors cannot be properly valued by quantitative methods (Weber et al., 1946) And some information are results from qualitative research (Ragin and Amoroso, 2011)(Ragin, 1987). besides we have to take into account the external factors that affect the computerization process. olibanum the research will not be immune to external elements. resultTo conclude we have reached a point on introducing austerity measures on the Mediterranean Countries, where we should be very careful of our actions. Especially when the EU is on a dense position because of political rivalries, unwillingness and antagonism amongst union states. And portray a lack of focus to the core of the issue. If we do not act more carefully and if we do not try to find the right questions for the problem the situation will become irreversible.The question should not be how to stop the deficit, instead should be how those problematic countries can improve their public sector? And more specifically at what extend the computerization of public sector in Mediterranean Nations affect their economic stability? It should be appropriate to close with a quote from Simon H. A is the granting immunity it evokes from tho se who refuse to see in it anything more than an enlarged desk calculator. zero(prenominal) since the Darwinian controversy of the past century we have seen such a aflame defense of the uniqueness of man sic against claims of kinship by systems that dont belong to his species. (Simon H.A, 1973 503)ReferencesBRUIJN, J. A. D. 2006. Managing performance in the public sector, New York, NY, Routledge. DUNLEAVY, P. 2006. Digital era governance IT corporations, the state, and E-government, Oxford, Oxford University disturb. GAO. 1991a. SSA Computers Long Rans Vision Needed to Guide future systems modernisation efforts, GAO/IMTEC P1- 44, Washington DC. HAYES, F. O. R. 1977. Productivity in local government, Lexington, Mass., Lexington Books. HERRING, P. 1967. Public administration and the public interest, New York,, Russell & Russell. HMSO. 1983a. Efficiency and Effectiveness in theCivil Service, HMSO, capital of the United Kingdom HOOD, C. 1998. The art of the state culture, rhetoric , and public management, Oxford New York, Clarendon Press. IMF. DECEMBER 2011. IMF republic Report No. 11/351, Greece Fifth Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement, Rephasing and Request for Waivers of Nonobservance of Performance Criteria Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion and Statement by the Executive Director for Greece., Washington, D.C. IMF. JULY 2012. IMF Country Report No. 12/168, Italy Selected Issues, Washington, D.C. IMF. JUNE 2012. IMF Country Report No. 12/137, Spain Financial Stability Assessment, Washington, D.C. KLAUS SCHWAB. 2012. WEF Global fighting 2012-2013, Geneva, World Economic Forum. KLEIN, R & CARTER, N. 1988. Performance Measurement a review of concepts and issues. Discussion Paper No 18, Public Finance Foundation KUOPUS, JORMA. 1988. Hallinnon lainalaisuus ja automatisoitu verohalliuto, Jyuaskyla, Finnish Lawyers Publishing Company MARGETTS, H. 1999. Information technology in government Britain and America, London New York, Routledge. NAUR, P. 1974. Concise survey of computer methods, New York, Petrocelli Books. OECD. 2011. OECD Working on Bribery, Annual Report 2011POLLITT, C. & BOUCKAERT, G. 1995. Quality improvement in European public services concepts, cases and commentary, London Thousand Oaks, Calif., Sage. RAGIN, C. C. & AMOROSO, L. M. 2011. Constructing social research the unity and variety of method, Los Angeles, SAGE Publications. RAGIN, C. C. 1987. The comparative method moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies, Berkeley, University of California Press. SIMON H,A . 1973. Applying Information technology to organization Design, Public Administration Review, 33 268-78 SNELLEN, I. T. M., DONK, W. B. H. J. V. D. & BAQUIAST, J.-P. 1989. Expert systems in public administration evolving practices and norms, Amsterdam New York, Elsevier wisdom Publishers. TRANSPARENCY INTERNATIONAL. 2011. Corruption Perception Index 2011 WEBER, M., GERTH, H. H. & MILLS, C. W. 1946. From Max Weber Essays in socio logy, New York,, Oxford university press. WILLCOCKS, L. & HARROW, J. 1992. Rediscovering public services management, London, McGraw-Hill. WORLD BANK. 2008. WORLD BANK Doing subscriber line 2012, http//www.doingbusiness.org/rankings, last checked 29/10/2012