Machiavelli vs. George W. Bush

Machiavelli Vs. George W. scrub The Bush Administration was a in truth polemical topic after the terrorist attacks on 9/11/01. maculation some people said, It was the right thing to do, others believed it was an outrage, and blamed Bushs ideas on bodyer, dictator-like philosophers. Niccolo Machiavelli was a famous political philosopher, who was in my opinion, the most uniform to the Bush Administration. Machiavellis ideas on civil liberties, what government is supposed to provide and value against, sovereignty, and how public morality and private invade intersect in decision making who makes policy is really similar to Bush.Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a story, The Prince, which had drastically modifyd his view in political leadership. After the terrorist attacks Bush also had a drastic change in political views. Bush went from focusing on health safeguard and taxes, to preventing terrorist attacks, going to war, and creating agencies to help the U. S stay safe. Bush took dra stic move to protect the homeland and its interests abroad.He created a new cabinet-level agency, the Department of Homeland security measures this consolidated 20 agencies under one cabinet umbrella. President Bush believed that helping to build free and prosperous societies (including Afghanistan and Iraq), the U. S and its allies would get ahead in making America more(prenominal) secure and the world more peaceful (u-s-history. com, 18). Bush also proposed a very controversial nationalist Act, which had given the intelligence and law enforcement communities powerful tools to enhance their anti-terrorism musical compositiondate.Machiavelli believed that The Prince should have unalterable readiness for war, and that it is not reasonable to suppose that one who is armed with adapt willingly one who is unarmed or that any unarmed man will remain safe among armed servants (pg. 151, 1c, 2p, Ebenstein). The Patriot Act was controversial manly because the increased surveillance an d investigation capabilities seemed to go against some of our guaranteed rights of the Constitution.Machiavelli had two goals for his story, one, to get back into government work and two, a call for stability of an Italian nation state (free from religious or secular strange rule). The Bush administration countered that under the threat of terrorist attacks in American cities and against American interests worldwide, previous defensive tactics were inadequate. Offensive action in the form of intelligence gathering and pre-emptive strikes against threatening regimes were deemed appropriate under the circumstances. Machiavelli believed in save two types of governments monarchies, and republics.Tyranny is included in monarchy and is a rulers rectitude to adapting to the situation (lion and fox). The masses are happy with the arrangement because they are each awed or scared by the tyrant. Republics based on law, governed with the interest of most citizens, all classes have a chanc e of serving in government conflict between classes- deflect individual ambition. In Machiavellis eyes, Bush is portrayed more of a Republican. Machiavelli strongly believed it was safer to be feared sooner than loved. Power must be the main positive concept in a Prince.He urges princes not to help others, be stingy, cruel, deceptive, and to get others to do the fetid work so they can escape blame, yet he doesnt believe in neither good nor evil. His mindset is very confusing, and very contradictory. Machiavelli strongly followed the story of Cesare Borgia de Orco and how he used personnel as a means of attaining individual ends. Right after this Machiavelli reveals that he condemns those who use violence to destroy governments even as he praises those founders who establish strong monarchies and republics.